Board Thread:Changes in the Club Penguin Pookie Wiki/@comment-28542416-20160408163731/@comment-28600514-20160409041739

Pookieluv wrote: Reasons Why This Is The Stupidest Thing I've Ever Read:

"She also made a thread about Tech's demotion." How is this a reason to demote me? Lots of users wanted Tech to be demoted, so I created a thread about it. I did nothing wrong. You're actually doing the exact same thing right now, so shouldn't you be demoted too?

"I was banned two weeks for nothing!" Obviously you were banned for something. We can't just ban people for no reason, that's against the rules. Besides, I clearly remember giving you warnings, and you ignoring them. We all agreed that you needed to be blocked. It wasn't nothing, Tech.

"She called be a 'bossy jerk who thinks she rules the Internet'." Okay, Tech, before you post stuff like this, maybe you should look at the actual thread that you found this from. What I really said was. "Object is stupid, YourTypicalWeirdo is annoying, Tech is a bossy jerk. Now, none of these things are true." See? You can't just take a sentence, then take out the good parts and make it look like I did something wrong. I said that it wasn't true. You can't use that against me.

"C H U N K Y clearly said that three days was the limit for bullying". The last time I looked at the rules page, I didn't see that!

"BECAUSE HER BEST FRIEND IN REAL LIFE IS AN ADMIN, ALBEIT A DIRTY, LYING, PAIR OF SHEARS WHO OUGHT TO BE KICKED TO THE CURB!" Wow, you're a nice person.

"She gave admin privileges to a complete stranger!" Is this still an argument? As I've already told you a million times, the only reason I gave it to her is so that she could help me if I asked her to. She actually only used my account one time, and during that one time, I was on the phone while she did it.

"She has been banning unfairly." Alright, listen up. The only reason we banned Bellatrix is because we were given a huge list of rude things she's been saying to other users. Once I saw this list, I asked Object and DW to come to chat and discuss her behavior, and we all agreed that she should be blocked. So, if you really think that the ban was unfair, then why aren't you demoting Object and DW as well?

"Jillian highlighted the Faith's Youtube Channel thread". Oh, okay. Let's all just post fake evidence now! Sounds like fun. OBJECT SAID THAT YTW IS A POOPHEAD!

"She is lying about the reports she gets." I don't think you understand. I have been getting PMs... from other users... telling me... that users have been bullying. And you think I'm lying about the PMs that I've been getting? How do you know that? You're just making stuff up. Again.

"She has been inactive." Hmm! I distinctly remember highlighting a thread that said I was going to be taking a break and that you shouldn't get worried because I'm not going inactive. Did you forget about this message?

Like Jill said, I did ask to be demoted, but I am un-asking that now. Clearly, this wiki needs an actual admin to cope with all this drama.

The first three things were said by Tech, so I'll leave them be.

4) CHUNKY mentioned that was the limit on an old, highlighted thread made in 2015. I'll post the link once I find it.

5) As I've mentioned, I'm a very nice person until I get ticked off. :/

6) Yes, this still is. She's used your account more than once, and she's been acting like an admin. As she is a complete stranger to us, we don't know when she could vandalize or hack the wiki via your account.

7) Sigh.... http://club-penguin-super-hero-agency.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:20439

8) I made a mistake at that one, I'll admit.

9) If you're going to say "several reports" please, atleast provide testimony. It's the least you could do. How could anyone know whether you were lying or not.

10) Okay, that reason was crap. I'm asking Phil to alter the post.

Yes, and we already have actual admins, like Phil and Object.