Thread:Omegasonic2000/@comment-25236631-20141122200331/@comment-11084328-20150326204340

Pam pam4 wrote: Omegasonic2000 wrote: Pam pam4 wrote: Omegasonic2000 wrote: Pam pam4 wrote: Omegasonic2000 wrote: Pam pam4 wrote: MarinaTheTenkaiKnight wrote: Kidzrule wrote: Omegasonic2000 wrote: MarinaTheTenkaiKnight wrote: Dis was edited but everyone didn't realize that

you need a screenshot to prove No offence, but that REALLY sounds like something you'd do AND I trust him more than I trust you. And why would I waste my time writing that if it's fake

Whale stop swearing 1. It is fake, and you wouldn't waste your time since you know how to bold stuff and italicize.

2. You don't control me. Don't play innocent. That isn't fake. Finally, an ADMIN steps in. I'll let you handle this, as I have now nothing to do here. I'll do what I'll have to do. However, as a responsible former admin (note that I'd rather slam my face on the wall several times than say the following), I must say this is all circumstantial evidence. We don't know if it truly happened. There're three steps in knowledge: what we believe, what we know and what we can demonstrate. You guys (as well as myself) believe she did it, and you believe you know she did it, but can any of you prove it? And I don't mean with just text, or saying "I saw her do it". Images or videos are required. I'm sorry, but it's my responsibility as a former admin. I have a vaild block reason here, anyway. Blocking in on-line forums is like when a policeman arrests people IRL. Evidence is required, and not circumstantial one. Otherwise, the policeman (in this case the admins, in this case you) might be suspected of corruption. I didn't say ANYTHING about blocking Whale for that. If you look, she was swearing. Of course I've looked. Maybe you've overlooked.