Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-24170167-20160325190245/@comment-27100993-20160326154607

DoctorWhooves wrote: Let me repeat myself; HE. IS. NECCESSARY. If you demote him, as soon as C H U N K Y arrives, he'll repromote him again, because he needs him. And when has he been a "horrible, unfair admin"? He's never abused his rights and hasn't done anything wrong. Rights don't mean ANYTHING on chat, if you don't need to kick someone. So how does spamming on chat automatically gain him that title? He banned you on Pookieluv because you allowed someone that we don't neccesarily know on to an account with rights. They could do anything. It was fair. He was protecting the wiki and has been branded as horrible and unfair; but it seems like the only person who is being "horrible and unfair" is you. Just ban him from chat for a bit; you don't need to demote him over this whole situation. Let's look at this entire statement, shall we?

"Let me repeat myself, HE. IS. NECCESSARY. If you demote him, as soon as C H U N K Y arrive, he'll repromote him again, because he needs him."

Ha, as if C H U N K Y is ever gonna arrive. I've never seen C H U N K Y active on this wiki ever. Granted, I don't really use this wiki too much, but still, I've never seen him here.

"And when has he been a "horrible unfair admin"? He's never abused his rights and hasn't done anything wrong."

Hello, are you BLIND? Honestly, he's posting Beyonce lyrics in the threads! And completely ruining the chat!

"Rights don't mean ANYTHING on chat, if you don't need to kick someone."

So you're saying that if Pookieluv got online and went to chat and starting spamming and swearing and kicking and blocking innocent people, you wouldn't care? Hmph. I highly doubt that.

"He banned you on Pookieluv because you allowed someone that we don't neccesarily know on an account with rights. They could do anything. It was fair."

Did you even read Pookieluv's message? I was never on Pookieluvs account. Besides, I would never do anything on her account without her permission. Super Miron never blocked me, he blocked Pookieluv. Pookieluv came home from theatre, I told her what Miron had done, I asked if I could block him, she said that she would just do it instead, she got on her account, and what happened? Super Miron blocked her. You know, even if it WAS me who was on Pookieluvs account, he still would not be able to block me fairly, since I hadn't done anything wrong.

"He was protecting the wiki -"

Alright, I'm just gonna stop this sentence right here. PROTECTING THE WIKI? Have you ever seen him make an edit in your LIFE? The only thing he does is post annoying memes and then SOMEHOW, you people think he's a cool guy. Honestly, you guys all think he's some knight in shining armor, when he's probably just a teenager in his parents basement who trolls all day.

"It seems like the only person being horrible and unfair is you."

Really? Really? Really? He is an admin who has been breaking rules and blocking innocent users. I ask Pookieluv if we can start a vote to demote him, and suddenly, you all think that WE'RE the bad ones? When have we EVER done anything bad? I've only been on this wiki for like two days!

"Just ban him from chat for a bit."

Hmm, let's think. Well, me and Pookieluv actually tried to do that, about a day ago... but it didn't really work... because HE BLOCKED HER FIRST EVEN THOUGH SHE DIDN'T DO A SINGLE THING.

"You don't need to demote him over this whole situation."

Actually, we do. According to Pookieluv, after you break at least two rules, after you've gotten two verbal warnings, you will get blocked. We don't even want to block Super Miron, we just want to demote him. He should be THANKFUL.

If you guys want to change your vote after reading this message, then FEEL FREE, no one will judge you. I just cannot believe that any of you are supporting this annoying rule-breaker. It's worse than supporting Donald Trump, my goodness.